America has
made two great contributions to international society. Although both may appear
today in corrupted form, yet has much progress been made; and we, as a shining
example to the rest of the world, have much to reflect upon, when we
contemplate our legacy and what we shall leave to posterity. I speak, of
course, of those noblest of institutions, that any one should be ashamed if he
did not promote or make aspiration thereto; the first being our democratic form
of government itself which, however flawed, yet serves as a model of freedom
and justice to all; and second, also, perhaps, the greater of the two, our
music, or rather, the music that has been tempered in the crucible of American
Democracy through the blood, sweat and tears of our African American community.
The
structure of our constitution and legal system is complex, yet its great
inspiration, to those noble men who framed Her parameters over two centuries
past, comes from the ancient Greek city-state of Athens. Athens valued, as we
should do well to emulate, the arts and freedom, above all else. When we claim
in America that we would accept death, rather than submit our liberty to
tyranny from abroad or within, we are echoing the sentiments of the Athenians
who led the resistance against the invading Persian Empire and were victorious
through the efforts of their superior naval force. And when we host televised
competitions and award a victor who through the power of song wins popular
approval amid much applause, we are reminded, albeit in the most grotesquely
debased form, of the dramatic festivals in which Athenians competed for the
title of greatest tragic poet. Certainly, American Idolatry and the pale façade
of our annual Gramophone Awards are a far cry from the Golden Age of Motown, from
the deep blues of the Mississippi Delta, the raucous jazz of New Orleans, the
jumpin’ boogie from Chicago, or the wave of hysteria that enveloped our nation,
and then the entire planet in the wake of rock and roll. Not too long ago,
television programs actually hosted real
musicians, bringing their jubilant melodies to a national audience.
Not
freedom, but rather slavery, was the background for the development of this
most powerful of art forms in our country. How did the highest product of
culture emerge from a people who were not even considered Men and Women? Just
as the pinnacle of performing art was perfected two and a half millennia ago,
under the threat of civil war and Persian occupation: this seeming paradox was
recognized by Friedrich Nietzsche, who could be seen as the unconscious prophet
and philosopher of the rock and roll revolution, in his late work Twilight of the Idols:
“One would have to seek the highest type of
free man where the greatest resistance is constantly being overcome: five steps
from tyranny, near the threshold of the danger of servitude.”
In fact, we find our modern Übermenschen quite over
that threshold…volumes have been written, I suppose, on the development of the
Negro spiritual, or ‘slave song’ in the cotton fields of the American South
over the span of 250 years; if they have not, then shame on music scholarship!
The convergence of African, Christian and Native American elements was
synthesized by the tireless laborers, whose voices were as mighty as their
muscles, into a distinct, yet universally plaintive cry in the wilderness of America.
Nietzsche’s description of the origin and function of Attic tragedy in The Birth of Tragedy has always struck
me as intimately related to the development of black music in America.
As blacks
gained nominal freedom, they took up European instruments (which, for the most
part, have their ultimate origin in an ancient African or Near-Eastern
ancestor) such as the guitar and piano, after having been barred from playing
their own native drums as part of a systematic methodology of disempowerment
and cultural castration that had forced their music up to that point to be
completely a cappella, as well as highly metaphorical, in order to communicate
things it would be best for the slavedriver not to understand (‘til the tables
were turned, and he should catch a fire.) The blues emerged from out the cotton
fields where blacks now worked essentially as tenant farmers (or ‘sharecroppers’,)
the same class that arose for exploitation from the earliest days of Athenian
democracy, which, howevermuch we may now laud its noble principles of freedom,
justice and equality, was from the first a system enacted for the purpose of
concentrating capital and rebelling against the restrictions of cultural integrity
that the aristocratic nobility had formerly imposed.
The blues bears more than superficial
resemblance to ancient Attic Tragedy. Effectively the singer is a lone actor,
suffering some Promethean pain or burden before the audience, who were half-satyr
themselves and quite far from Schlegel’s ‘ideal spectator.’ Originally, in
church or field, there would be an actual chorus who responded vocally and in
harmony to the lead singer (or pastor,) just as in the old tragedies of Greece.
In the blues, instrumentation comes to take more and more of the role of the
chorus upon itself. The singer may be answered by the refrain of a harmonica,
or a lick from his own guitar, crying over the irrevocable sorrow this man had
just uttered.
Well! So
much for the blues being a democratic institution. We have seen, rather, that
while arising from conditions of actual slavery (and later sharecropping) the
blues actually presented, both viscerally and spiritually, a manifestation of a
far more noble and proud type of man than mainstream Protestant White America
had conjured forth up to then.
If blues
and spirituals represented the Dionysian
element in American music, and the European traditions, such as classical and
marching music, for the most part were of an Apollonian nature, it was Jazz that first sought to merge these two
traditions into a novel and distinctly American art-form. This is analogous to
Nietzsche’s description of the development of tragedy, and we can hear, in its
ultimate development and crescendo before being drowned in the flood of rock
and roll, the wild wisdom of Silenus and the echoes of Pan’s holy piping from
the old forests of Paradise in the wailing of Miles Davis’s muted trumpet and
flugelhorn on Sketches of Spain.
This third
deity of artistic creation, then, following Apollo
and Dionysus, is Athena, patron Goddess and namesake of Athens, the birthplace of
democracy. Before we discuss the democratic spirit of jazz (which may, in fact,
be the purest expression of true democracy thus far) it is worth noting exactly
what Athena’s cult and the political
structure of the Demos had to
struggle against.
In the
popular mythology of the period, Athens was hard-pressed to decide between
Athena, Goddess of Wisdom (and, by some accounts, organized warfare; more
specifically, battle strategy and tactics, often in conjunction with Nike, Goddess of victory) and Poseidon,
the all-powerful Lord of the Sea, Zeus’s elder brother who had, in all
likelihood, assumed an even more prominent role in more ancient times, before
the arrival of the Dorians to the Aegean peninsula. Although the great Sea-God
impressed the citizens with his control of the natural waterbodies, providing a
spring to sustain their health and make civilization even possible in the arid
climate of Attica, Athena gave the Hellenes the sacred olive tree and won their
eternal favor! Olive oil is extremely useful, for cooking and food, as
lamp-fuel and to ‘anoint’ (the Greek source of the word ‘Christ’) one’s scalp
and body. We would also do well to keep in mind the story of Noah’s flood, when
the dove returns to the father of all modern peoples with an olive leaf (also
possessive of many healing properties itself) in its mouth, signifying the
recession of Jehovah’s wrath and a new era of peace and prosperity, also
symbolized by the rainbow.
But what
had been lost, with the abandonment of the rites of Neptune? (I use the
Romanized name simply for variation; any writer worth his sea-salt detests
repetition of terms.) But what great progress had been made! The barbarian had
become Greek! No more would we
sacrifice our virgin daughters to the wild wind, like cold Agamemnon, or live
in ignorance and superstition, projecting anthropomorphic personas upon every
force of nature we should meet; nay, indeed, ne’er again should we bow to a
monarch of dubious divinity who suffered us to beg silver Drachmas with his
uncaring face minted upon their surface!
Or? Had we
not, perhaps, given up the riches of Crete, the nobility of the Minoan
civilization, mistakenly referred to as Atlantis when in fact, it had never
sunk beneath the ocean, but only beneath the horizon of our consciousness as we
became more and more caught up in a military-industrial complex, possibly the
only way a popular democracy tends to lead, when it is inherently based on
redistribution of wealth (but certainly not equality
of wealth) and must necessarily demolish all those noble paragons of culture
and civilization which get in the way of its own rampant ambition and base
impulsivity.
Well then!
So much for our prejudiced and liberal esteem of democracy-in-itself! (I
suppress a chuckle.) Back to New Orleans, on the other side of Atlantis and
beyond Columbus’s West Indies, where the descendants of slaves from Africa,
Frenchmen from Canada, Caribbean immigrants and the indigenous peoples of
America were all mixing together in the same pot, and whatever it was they were
cookin’, it sure smelled spicy! Despite the just-acknowledged racial and
cultural cross-pollination which gave N’Orleans its distinctive character, we
shall not waist any time disputing the primarily Black origins of jazz music. To some extent the forms were adapted
out of European marching-band (and, slightly later, classical) music; but to
assume that lends any amount of credit to European music for the development of
jazz, would be more ludicrous than labeling Dvořák’s
‘Slavonic Dances’ as folksongs, merely because he used his native Bohemian
rhythms as a springboard for fashioning contemporary European art-music in the
tradition of Beethoven, Schubert and Chopin. It was in fact Dvořák,
living for a while in America, who tellingly predicted that, for a truly
American music to develop, it would have to incorporate the spiritual music of
the African members of our nation, as well as to some extent Native American
musical tradition, the latter being more difficult to trace perhaps, but far
from absent in American music, particularly so the farther South one goes. Well
then! Dvořák would have been proud to hear the full development of jazz music,
what the writer Amiri Baraka accurately referred to as ‘American Classical
Music.’
What
it is, jazz music was the most honest and thorough expression of Democracy in
America, that Logos for which our forefathers fought the British Crown, giving
countless sons to Hades for the sake of preserving the liberty and right to
justice of the first truly Free State in two thousand years. It was democratic
in form and structure: as the style developed, it became characteristic for
each instrumentalist to take a consecutive solo (rather than having a certain
‘elite’ of soloists amid a servile orchestra, all strumming to the master’s notation)
and cooperatively to weave the whole fabric of the piece together
extemporaneously. Although geniuses such as Duke Ellington (who still gets the
shaft in American music history behind George Gerhswin) often held a monopoly
(also highly characteristic of democracy) in the output of popular
compositions, there was nonetheless a great deal of cooperative songwriting
that occurred, often one individual composing the music (which, again, was
never completely set in stone, but open to improvisatory
arrangement-in-the-moment) and another the lyrics. Jazz hits consisted of songs
as well as instrumental pieces, and rapidly began to sweep the nation in a
great furor. Every dance hall in America now wanted to get their hands on this
wild, pulsive enchantment from the rich culture of the Negro South.
And
they did! These nightclubs that hosted the musicians, as well as the recording
studios that would record them, made a killing overnight. The white men who
controlled these institutions, having the means of production at their
disposal, were able to manipulate the balance of supply and demand, exploiting
the (often unspoken) system of racism that still gripped much of our country at
the time, to turn outrageous profits out of musical prodigies who were, for the
most part, compensated little better than the sharecroppers we mentioned
earlier.
It
didn’t stop there. One of America’s earliest contributions to world culture, as
it were, sadly and to our shame, moral and esthetic, were the blackface
minstrel shows in which white performers would imitate an exaggerated (and
politically motivated) stereotype of black musicians, often wearing dark
make-up to ‘dress the part.’ This trend continued, in a more sublimated fashion,
when white musicians began to perform jazz music themselves at many of the
white-owned clubs that were drawing so much attention and cash. Probably most
of the white artists who began to perform jazz had an honest appreciation of
this black musical form, and many of them virtually worshipped the great black
masters as they studied their licks on stage. Shrewd businessmen and
insular-minded bigots, however, saw in this a way to appropriate this
incredible artistic phenomenon to their own ‘race’, and thereby fend off the
threatening insecurity that perhaps the greatest thing to come out of America
was actually a black thing.
Europe,
however, did not fail to see the truth of the matter. The true musical masters
(black and, sometimes white) were given the recognition their talents deserved
and offered, almost paradoxically, a more democratic welcome in Europe than
they enjoyed in their own divided nation. Although this humanity and
appreciation must have been as pleasant to the visiting jazz stars as it was
well-deserved, I think it is safe to say that by far Europe gained much more
from the exchange. This first, truly American music, was more than just a
rhythm or a melody…it was a new culture, something the world had not yet
experienced, a new strut on the stage by Dionysus, complete with sharp, flashy
wardrobe from Apollo, and of course, it literally brought democracy to the world.
Particularly
during the Second World War, when American soldiers were launched by the
thousands overseas to protect the ideals of liberty and democracy, American
music, American dress, American culture in general were being exported along
with the troops; everyone in Western Europe was already dancing to swing by
this point, the American movie star had affected the global ideal of nobility
and greatness; now the jazz musician ushered in a totally new conception of
status: ‘cool.’ Probably the most commercially successful of these jazz
musicians, overall, were the famous swing singers, many of whom were white.
Frank Sinatra may well have deserved his celebrity; not only was he
fantastically talented, his charisma and thorny charm endeared him to the
American heart, both black and white, and in fact did much to popularize the
jazz idiom to mainstream white America. But we must not ignore certain other
socio-political factors that may have contributed to his tremendous popularity
and commercial dominance. Sinatra, along with many other entertainers, then and
now, had ties to the mob. He was smooth enough that he could mingle with legitimate
politicians as well, but at the end of the day the mob code ruled the streets,
and there was little that could be done against them. When Sammy Davis, Jr.
decided to change his plans and back out of a gig he had arranged with some of
The Rat Pack’s mob contacts, those same mobsters who would plot the
assassination of JFK informed Mr. Davis, in no uncertain terms, that he would fly down to fulfill his duties to
the mob, or his plane would not land at all. Organized crime is a political
fact of most modern urbanized states and is difficult, either to define or
ignore, but has been entrenched in many regions of Western Civilization at
least since the principalities of post-Empire Italy through which Machiavelli
lived and wrote.
(On
a side note, to metaphorically assess the preceding nine paragraphs, we should
consult Heraclitus, the ‘Godfather’ of Greek philosophy. In a simple aphorism
of barbed wisdom, Heraclitus shows utmost contempt toward what has become our
own liberal-academic military-industrial regime in the United States:
If learning were a path of wisdom,
those most
learned about myth
would not
believe, with Hesiod,
that Pallas
in her wisdom gloats
over the
noise of battle.
Pallas is another name for Athena. In any case, the fact is
that since World War II we have been engaged in almost ceaseless military
intervention and, in some cases, virtual occupation. One thing that always
follows our military campaigns is American culture: our fashion, our
cigarettes, our movies and of course, our music, which has been spearheading
the cultural styles our nation embraces since the jazz age. These styles often
begin among a small segment of the black community in America, until they find
their way all across the developed world.)
Never has the Apollonian dream-world been more
powerful in our country than during the period immediately following our
victory in World War II. Expansionist, almost imperialist abroad, we became
incredibly insular at home, locked up behind short white picket fences and forced,
post-atomic smiles. Conformity was an unparalleled virtue. Sinatra, Bing Crosby
and other, less talented white jazz singers were still very much in vogue. The
vocabulary of jazz itself was evolving, as a new breed of musician, including Dizzy
Gillespie, Charlie Parker and Miles Davis, worked out what would become known
as ‘be-bop’ in the clubs around Harlem, particularly Minton’s on W 118th.
Meanwhile, the blues had become electrified, and the clubs and studios in
Chicago and other urban centers in the Mid-West and North were producing a much
heavier sound, with guitars and vocals heavily amplified and increasingly
distorted. Howlin’ Wolf in particular laid the framework for what would
ultimately become ‘hard rock’, thanks in large part to the incredible
guitarists who worked with him, and to Willie Dixon, the genius who wrote most
of Wolf’s hit songs.
Parallel
developments were happening throughout the world of black music: Ray Charles
developed ‘soul’; musicians like Jimmy Reed were working out what became known
as ‘Rhythm and Blues’. And also, artists like Ike Turner (who played briefly
with Howlin’ Wolf,) Chuck Berry and Little Richard created the backbone of rock
and roll. The Dionysian rebellion was in full bloom.
‘Rock n’
Roll’, as it became affectionately known, had an immediate and deeply-resonant
impact on the middle-class white youth in our country. This may seem
surprising, given such an audience’s superficial disconnect from the cultural
origins of the genre, but its reasons are evident and two-fold. First, and most
poignantly, the affluence and comfort of the post-war era yet left a gaping
void, culturally and spiritually, for the heirs of its supposed progress and
prosperity. White men were reaping the benefits of our economic supremacy,
making a decent living without the prerequisite of higher education or even
necessarily a skilled trade. But their wives were often bored, depressed and
shut-off from society (a social phenomenon more reminiscent of Greece in
general than the Roman period) and their children, particularly as they reached
puberty, felt constricted by the social appendices of protestant morality,
whose gnarled roots pervaded the very soil of the American conscience. Which
brings us to the second cause of their kindred sympathy for rock and roll
music, the appeal of unbridled sexuality as sublimated by the lyric genius of
Chuck Berry, precisely distilling the essence of the American Dream (freedom,
automobiles, hedonistic enjoyment just short of debauch, kissing a pretty girl
at the school dance) and translating that wisdom from an intelligent black man
to every youth in America, and later the world.
Expectedly,
it took little time at all before white people had reinvented rock as their own
music, ostensibly marketing it as an urban hillbilly phenomenon. To be fair,
there were always white folk and country influences in the earliest rock and
roll, which were developed further by artists such as Jerry Lee Lewis. But when
Caucasian celebrities such as Buddy Holly, Roy Orbison and, above all, Elvis
Presley usurped the throne that had been forged by the great black artists,
something was lost, culturally, even as America gained some of the most
fantastic music ever recorded.
Before we
proceed with the evolution of rock and roll, let us examine once more the
circumstances from which American democracy arose in the first. Our Revolution
was fought against the agents of the British Crown, a monarchical power with
imperialist tendencies which exacted great tribute from her American colonies.
From where I type in the area of Boston, men such as Samuel Adams protested the
harsh taxes imposed by the King of England on the colonists. The Stamp Tax
effectively shut down the newspaper and legal industries, as every paper, marriage
license and legal writ could not be produced without some pence going to the
King’s coffers. Likewise the tax on tea, which led to the revolutionary action
of the Boston Tea Party, as well as our national preference for coffee which
persists to this day, and may well account for our dental superiority.
Let us
compare this to the ‘British Invasion’, when a horde of English bands of young
white boys, led by The Beatles, infiltrated the American market with their
interpretation of our own black American music. One of the greatest things to
come from this movement, aside from the great art of The Beatles themselves,
was that white American youth were now exposed to much of the true black
American music that started it all (rock and roll, Chicago blues, and of course
Mo Town, which I have sadly omitted from this essay, as that would have
involved further digression into such matters as Henry Ford and his investments
in Germany’s National Socialist Party, and I am already humbled by your
patience in indulging me thus far, Dear Reader.) Problem is, every time we buy
a record of these English covers of black music, or today, buy the songs off of
iTunes, we are in effect paying a tribute to the British Rock Royalty (well,
the Beatles’ catalogue is now in the hands of Sony and its shareholders.) The
Rolling Stones probably did more than any other act to expose us to the great
Chicago bluesmen, like Howlin’ Wolf and Muddy Waters, whose careers they
revitalized even as they built their own upon these men’s hard work, as the
European powers had made tremendous profits from the products of American slave
labor and the slave trade itself. Although, as the title of their album ‘Sticky
Fingers’ makes manifest, the Stones stole their music from America and sold it
back to us, there is a Robin Hood twist to this Canterbury Tale, in that they
gave back socio-cultural recognition and real economic agency, not only to the
artists they ripped off in the first place, but to later black musicians such
as Peter Tosh and Living Colour.
By far the
most culpable act in this process of pseudo-Colonial appropriation were the
English group Led Zeppelin. Their first album, easily dismissable in regards to
its cultural significance, despite the inspirational juxtaposition of folk and
rock elements, contains a number of plagiarisms, in this case mostly of earlier
white artists. The opening track, ‘Good Times, Bad Times’ is probably the best
and most original on the record. Certainly the main riff is an unparalleled
achievement in rock and roll. ‘Babe I’m Gonna Leave You’ follows which, despite
its ceded penmanship at the hands of Anne Bredon, and the insistence on the
adherence to Joan Baez’s version (or so-called ‘traditional arrangement’) which
is based upon a common flamenco pattern (see "Couldn't Get Much Higher": The Musical Legacy of Robby Krieger ) descending from the minor, the verse is
actually based upon a variation of this flamenco progression recorded on a
track by Donovan; in the case of A minor, F#dim is sounded before the typical
F/E of the sequence, giving it a very sad, jazzy feel which had always
impressed me as an example of Zeppelin’s creativity, until I recently heard the
Donovan song (not sure of name.) The opening of ‘Dazed and Confused’
incorporates the use of open harmonics heard on Buffalo Springfield’s ‘For What
It’s Worth’, although the rest of the song is quite original and in fact was
copied in numerous instances by Black Sabbath. The greatest theft is ‘Black
Mountain Side’, a deliberate rip-off of Bert Jansch’s ‘Black Waterside’, only
changing half a word in the title, although Page’s arrangement is amazing; Page
in fact owes a huge compositional and stylistic debt to Jansch. Then, of
course, are the two Willie-Dixon penned blues numbers, ‘You Shook Me’ and ‘I
Can’t Quit You Baby.’
Their
second album, which truly developed their ‘unique’ sound and in effect invented
hard rock and heavy metal, was basically a series of one Howlin’ Wolf rip-off
after another, in particular their big hit, ‘Whole Lotta Love’. The credit that
is given to artists like Link Wray, The Kinks and Led Zeppelin in the
development of power chords, the use of whole-tone as harmonic element in
progression, and what became hard rock in general should in fact go to Howlin’
Wolf’s guitarists, if not to Robert Johnson and the other acoustic blues
masters who were playing power chords decades earlier and exploited the natural
distortion of the recording technology of their day.
Throughout the 70’s, British
artists such as the Stones, Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, and King Crimson were selling
vast amounts of records to American consumers, stealing this uniquely American
art-form and stimulating the British economy, as they continued to profit from
the reggae music coming out of former-British-colony Jamaica.
After that, rock music suffered the
necessary fate of perhaps any democracy, fading into self-indulgent mediocrity.
Oscar Wilde’s summation of our nation’s history is quite fitting to the legacy
of commercial (white) rock music: “America is the only country that went from
barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.” The petty
class-struggle of English punk-rock, and the American pantheon of untrained
misfit musicians only inspired the modern ochlocracy of artistic values,
relegating musical taste to television and magazines whose primary incentive is
to sell an adult ideal of sexuality to children and a youthful ideal of
sexuality to adults, sentiments which now pervade all of liberal journalism,
cinema, and even the plastic arts, a phenomenon which perhaps can be blamed on
those same champions of freedom, democracy, and creativity who took this music
to such heights in the 60’s and 70’s, setting us up for “The Day the Music Died”
(see Opening the Doors to the New Aesthetic in Music.)
@dGabeEvau
@dGabeEvau